Miloš Forman’s ‘Amadeus’: A Stylish Cinematic Homage The Musical Prodigy Deserved

 

By Sven Mikulec

 
Miloš Forman’s 1984 period drama Amadeus surely has to be one of the best of its kind, and yet it seems a lot of people tend to ignore it when the 80’s cinematography is discussed. The filmmaker who delivered the exceptionally significant and continuously cherished One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest teamed up with the same producer, Saul Zaentz, and turned Peter Shaffer’s stage play into a thrilling, captivating portrait of the celebrated 18th century composer who posthumously entered each and every single musical chronicle published until this very moment. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was an individual whose personality, work and life naturally call for cinematic representation, but what Forman did here, with the help of Shaffer himself in the screenwriting role, was to tell a unique and inspiring story of jealousy, greed and, above all, humanity and love for music. When Forman first saw Shaffer’s play in London back in 1979, he immediately felt it was the type of material he could successfully breathe life into for the big screen.

In materializing his vision, he decided not to use accomplished, recognizable actors. After auditioning, he finally settled for F. Murray Abraham for the role of Salieri, a celebrated composer who realized his talents were no match for that of the up-and-coming, crude young Wolfgang. As Ebert quite cleverly put it, Salieri’s curse was to have the talent of a third-rate composer but the ear of a first-rate music lover. He instantaneously recognized Mozart’s divine gift, and despite the fact he was so wealthy he could have bathed in money and not give a damn, while Mozart was broke, this fact ate him alive, with jealousy and hatred consuming him from the inside. F. Murray Abraham is a pleasure to behold, but had Forman not chosen Tom Hulce to play the titular character, the film’s intriguing set-up would not have probably worked. Hulce and Abraham rule the screen, making us painlessly engulfed by the story: their on-screen magic is proof that Forman couldn’t have chosen more wisely.

Amadeus was mostly shot on the streets of Prague, which had the atmosphere, grace and architectural beauty to easily pass off as 18th century Vienna. Forman and Shaffer’s film turned the spotlight on both Mozart and Salieri, who gained at least a part of the recognition he craved for so passionately. Being a huge hit at the time of its release, Amadeus enjoyed a fruitful harvest at the Academy Awards, but more importantly than anything else, the Austrian musical prodigy, and the amazing tunes he created, were paid respect to in an appropriately wonderful fashion.

What we have here is a quite historic and rare screenplay: Peter Shaffer’s screenplay for Amadeus [PDF]. (NOTE: For educational and research purposes only). The DVD/Blu-ray of the film is available at Amazon and other online retailers. Absolutely our highest recommendation.

 

THE MAKING OF ‘AMADEUS’

This riveting film takes a look behind the scenes at one of the 20th century’s cinema classics and at one of contemporary cinema’s most maddeningly brilliant directors, Miloš Forman. Using never before seen materials, from original costume and set sketches to an innumerable collection of intimate on-set photography, blended with vibrant and revealing new interviews of the cast and crew, The Making of Amadeus weaves a spellbinding tale, filled with drama and humor. And at the center of it all is the indisputable creative genius of Miloš Forman and a cast of characters behind the lens as unique and idiosyncratic as that of the fictional world of in front of the lens. From start to finish, The Making of Amadeus takes an unblinking look at the trials and tribulations of this mammoth production effort.

 

Miloš Forman discusses his career from the difficulties making films like Loves of a Blonde and The Fireman’s Ball under the Soviet regime in his native Czechoslovakia, to directing award winning films like like One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Amadeaus with the creative freedom he found in the United States. —Visual History with Miloš Forman

 

SHOT TO REMEMBER: PLAY IT AGAIN, AMADEUS
by Henry Sheehan, DGA Quarterly

Miloš Forman’s sumptuous staging of Amadeus combined Hollywood spectacle and European mastery. In a scene from a costume ball, he discusses the method behind Mozart’s madness. In the scene Forman describes, Mozart, who is beginning to deteriorate, is visited by his stern father. Trying to convince him that he is doing well, Mozart takes him to a costume party where the composer for the first time sees the death mask and has a vision of his own demise.

Before this scene is one in which Mozart is humiliated by a rich merchant who is using him to teach his dogs to be silent when they hear music. Now we pan 180 degrees and see the outraged Mozart leave the house. We turn with him and discover that there is a bustling, big city full of life in the market. For that reason, I put the camera on a crane so that when he passes, the camera can go up and see the whole space, the crowd and life in the marketplace. This joyous city swallows Mozart as he walks through watching everything around him.

What was important for me here was to see Mozart walking, losing his gloomy mood and enjoying life again. That’s why I used the narrower street, so that when we see Mozart nothing distracts us. When I need to concentrate on one person, I use a longer lens that puts in focus just the distance where the main character is. Use of lenses for me is always dictated by how important it is to concentrate on a certain character’s image or things in the image. The depth of focus with a long lens can really help to streamline an audience’s interest.

Here, for the first time Mozart encounters the image of death. That’s why I led him to this close-up where we can see very clearly his change of expression. So in the split second before he realizes it’s his father, he’s panicked because it’s like an image of death. I didn’t want any lighting that would make deep shadows or anything like that, to make his face dramatic in any way. It has to be the expression here, the change of expression from a happy face to a panicked face.

I put the father in front of the window, so that he’s backlit, his face is dark and we just see the cape and the hat and the black face. The decision to shoot in widescreen was effectively decided by the look of the period, which is so rich and so lush. But when you need drama you can read on the faces of actors, when you go to the close-up or medium close-up, widescreen is more effective. In both Mozart’s close-up and the father’s, it’s just gray walls in the background. Nothing distracts you so you can get the full impact of the close-up.

I never use storyboards. I always like to come on the set and see the reality around me. Then I rehearse with the actors in the space, which is already finalized by the prop man, set decorator, set designer and costume designer. Only then do I decide how to cover the scene. Here, I wanted to show what the father has to deal with. Now Mozart has got himself in the fun of getting the mask and costumes. But it’s a little sinister. That’s why I put the camera a little lower, so we look from down to up.

If you notice, the black mask is being put on his father’s head, but it’s not from below. It’s absolutely a very normal camera, at a normal height. It’s like a POV of somebody. I didn’t want it to imply that the father is already being a sinister character. He’s not; he’s putting on the mask. That should be as real, as sober, as normal as anything else. You are just renting a mask, okay. So here are the guys from the shop putting the mask on his head, and nothing strange about it.

I first put the chairs in a circle. Then I set the frame so that we see as much as possible. I brought in the people who will play musical chairs, and ask them to play. I adjusted the camera angle, so that we wouldn’t miss any of this motion. Now I filled the rest of the stage with extras. I always like it when my assistant directors work with extras the way I work with the main actors; to explain what they’re doing there. So there is always in the background a little bit of a mess, but that makes it more real.

This is probably a 75mm lens. When Mozart’s father first comes to visit him, we see the same kind of glass of wine at Mozart’s piano. It is preparing us for the end, when he is very drunk very often. In this shot it’s like a rosé wine, because if it was a white wine it might look like water. If it’s a deep red wine, it might look like coffee. These masks were created by costume designer Theodor Pistek. He manufactured them individually for each of the characters so that they could breathe, act and behave not as actors but as human beings.

This mask has on one side the stern face; on the other side, which is on the back of the head, is a smiling face. But what I did was that the father has the smiling face in front. So Mozart laughs because he sees the smiling face of the mask. But then the father takes off the mask, under this smiling mask is this very stern and severe and judgmental look of his father. I wanted to have this kind of a contrast there.

So here, in these three images (8-10), the main drama between father and son is taking place. I’m very much thinking about editing during the shooting. I must make sure that I’m giving myself more than one option in editing. So that this could cut very well with this one, but what about if it doesn’t? So then I want to have another angle, or the second camera doing something I could use if it doesn’t work. I am thinking about editing, but I never give myself just one possibility for an edit.

This shot is done exactly the other way from how I did the musical chairs. Here, I first staged the life on the staircase with the extras. Once that looked real and exciting, I asked Salieri to find his way through the crowd. The crowd is fixed and the actor has to avoid bumping into the extras. We are not even sure why we are seeing this shot: you see someone, then he disappears again, and suddenly he’s here in front of you and you know who he is. This is probably a 32mm, a wider lens, which will give you the depth of focus so you can see everything.

I do a composition so that it pleases my eye. Of course, whatever composition and angle I choose has to serve the story. It was very important for me to see the desperate Mozart’s effort to placate his father. Not to simply read it on his face, but to have this bulk, this blackness of his masked father there, and nothing to distract the audience’s eye from it. Again, it’s with a longer lens and everything in the background is not noticeable. But it is also important the audience feels the background is there, that we are there, that it’s real.

For this kind of shot, where Mozart is playing the piano upside down, you have to be very careful that you know what you want to do, so that you find some stuntmen who are strong enough and skillful enough not to drop him. To get these shots from my point of view was very easy. Itwas incredibly difficult for Tom Hulce to learn. He didn’t know at which moment we will see his hands connected to his face in a long shot, so he had to learn much more. He practiced several hours a day and I was told he didn’t hit one wrong key.

In the first shot (number 13), you can’t see Mozart’s face; it could have been a double. So that’s why I went close-up from the front, so that we could see his face and see his fingers on the piano. I don’t think that anybody who doesn’t play piano can really appreciate how incredibly difficult this is—to play backwards. That’s why I went to the close-up, so we know that he is really doing it, it’s not a double. It was amazing. But then he sees Salieri in his mask, and the scene ends on a dark note. —Miloš Forman

 
Winner of two Academy Awards for Best Director, Miloš Forman talks at length about his days as a film student in then communist Czechoslovakia, how film festivals and the international success of Loves of a Blonde (1965) enabled him to travel abroad, why his last Czech film was The Firemen’s Ball (1967), coming to America to make Taking Off (1971) and why that was a total flop, the remarkable chain of events that brought him to One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest (1975), making Hair (1979), Ragtime (1981) and getting James Cagney out of retirement, casting F. Murray Abraham and Tom Hulce in Amadeus (1985) and Woody Harrelson and Courtney Love in The People vs. Larry Flynt (1996), arguing with authors and directing actors, to his last film Goya’s Ghosts (2006) and why Napoleon’s invasion of 19th Century Spain should have been a cautionary tale for more recent military adventures. An extraordinary life, and a master filmmaker.

 

Here are several photos taken behind-the-scenes during production of Miloš Forman’s Amadeus. Still photographers: Phil Bray & Jaromír Komárek. Courtesy of Archive of Miloš Forman; The Saul Zaentz Company; AMPAS; Warner Bros./Everett. Intended for editorial use only. All material for educational and noncommercial purposes only.

 

If you find Cinephilia & Beyond useful and inspiring, please consider making a small donation. Your generosity preserves film knowledge for future generations. To donate, please visit our donation page, or donate directly below:

Spread the love
Scroll to Top

We created the finest CINEPHILE CALENDAR: a beautifully designed, unique blend of info and art

By purchasing our film calendar, you’re directly helping us raise funds needed to keep Cinephilia & Beyond’s project running

This website is one of the places for long reads and deep dives on classic movies. Don’t let it fade away. Show your support in a great film site.

Edgar Wright

Support this site!

Guillermo del Toro

Hey all, let’s lend a hand to keep a valuable film resource alive and well. Donate to Cinephilia & Beyond!

Peter Ramsey

Cinephilia & Beyond is at a crossroads. Our survival is more precarious than ever due to a lack of funding, and we have just 22 days to secure the future of this invaluable resource. Without your support, we risk losing a vital archive of film knowledge and inspiration.

Please donate even $5 and invite your friends to donate. Every contribution, no matter the size, makes a difference.